Car comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015

2.2d

175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    207 km/h
    129 mph
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,480 kg
    3,263 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,115 km
    693 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    135 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
175hp130kW
190hp142kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,480kg3,263lb
1,846kg4,070lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
88.7s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
90.6s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
61.6s
Calculated
69.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,115km693mi
Calculated
1,078km670mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,191cc134cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,555mm179in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,865mm113in
Ground clearance
210mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
503L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,620L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
55L
CO2 emissions
136g/km
135g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d4,500 rpm2,000 rpm4,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
61.6 s
69.9 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 15 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,846 kg
4,070 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
207 km/h
129 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d8.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.8 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,115 km
693 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,078 km
670 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
8.8 s
207 km/h
129 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.8 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
175 hp
130 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
1,846 kg
4,070 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,115 km
693 mi
1,078 km
670 mi
CO2 score
136 g/km
135 g/km
Trunk score
503 L
17.8 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 366 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2d
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.2d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.2d
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 D4
2.2 CRDi
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
2.2d
2.0 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster