Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Lightest1,846 kg4,070 lb
- Best power-to-weight103 hp/t77 kW/t9.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions135 g/km
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,846kg4,070lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 90.6s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.0s Calculated | 69.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,053km654mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.0 s | 69.9 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,053 km 654 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,846 kg 4,070 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,053 km 654 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Is 4 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























