Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4vsToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

2.0 Si4

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015

4.6 V8

309 hp4608 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.3 s
Fastest top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Lightest
2,083 kg
4,592 lb
Best power-to-weight
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
214 g/km
Best estimated range
1,106 km
687 mi
Best overall score
59/100
Best performance score
52/100
Best economy score
82/100

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8

Most powerful
309 hp
230 kW
Highest torque
439 Nm
324 lb-ft
Largest trunk
259 L
Best practicality score
78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power	300hp224kW	309hp230kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	439Nm324lb-ft
Curb weight	2,083kg4,592lb	2,815kg6,206lb
Gross weight	3,000kg6,614lb	3,350kg7,385lb
Top speed	201 km/h 125 mph	195 km/h 121 mph
To 99% top speed	73.0s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated	98.9s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.3s	8.6s
0-200 km/h	86.5s Calculated	-
0-60 mph	6.9s Calculated	8.0s Calculated
Fuel consumption	9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK	13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK	18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK	11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.3s Calculated	16.2s Calculated
Power-to-weight	144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated	110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated	156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	1,106km687mi Calculated	669km416mi Calculated
Displacement	1,997cc122cu in	4,608cc281cu in
Length	4,879mm192in	4,975mm196in
Width	-	1,980mm78in
Height	1,803mm71in	1,955mm77in
Wheelbase	2,923mm115in	2,850mm112in
Front track	1,693mm67in	1,650mm65in
Rear track	1,686mm66in	1,645mm65in
Ground clearance	278mm11in	-
Trunk volume	221L	259L
Max trunk volume	1,686L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	7	7
Fuel tank	104L	93L
CO2 emissions	214g/km	327g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	5,500 rpm	1,500-4,000 rpm	5,750 rpm
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	5,500 rpm	3,400 rpm	5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.9 s	8.0 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.3 s	8.6 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	86.5 s	-
Top speed	201 km/h 125 mph	195 km/h 121 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.4 s	2.4 s
330 ft 101 m	6.5 s	6.7 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.9 s	10.3 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.8 s	13.5 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.3 s	16.2 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	145 km/h 90 mph	134 km/h 83 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	300 hp 224 kW
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	309 hp 230 kW

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 has 9 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	400 Nm 295 lb-ft
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	439 Nm 324 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	2,083 kg 4,592 lb
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	2,815 kg 6,206 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	201 km/h 125 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	195 km/h 121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	7.3 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	8.6 s

Although Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 4.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	1,106 km 687 mi
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	669 km 416 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	300 hp 224 kW	7.3 s	201 km/h 125 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	309 hp 230 kW	8.6 s	195 km/h 121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

Power	300 hp 224 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed 201 km/h 125 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	221 L 7.8 cu ft
Length	4,879 mm 192.1 in
Height	1,803 mm 71.0 in

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

Power	309 hp 230 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 195 km/h 121 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	259 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,975 mm 195.9 in
Height	1,955 mm 77.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

Power	300 hp 224 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed 201 km/h 125 mph

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

Power	309 hp 230 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 195 km/h 121 mph

13.9 L/100 km

16.9 mpg US

20.3 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK	7.3 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK	8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

Power

300 hp

224 kW

309 hp

230 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

439 Nm

324 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.3 s

8.6 s

Top speed

201 km/h

125 mph

195 km/h

121 mph

Lightness

2,083 kg

4,592 lb

2,815 kg

6,206 lb

Fuel consumption

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

13.9 L/100 km

16.9 mpg US

20.3 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	221 L 7.8 cu ft
Length	4,879 mm 192.1 in
Height	1,803 mm 71.0 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	259 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,975 mm 195.9 in
Height	1,955 mm 77.0 in

Range score

1,106 km

687 mi

669 km

416 mi

CO2 score

214 g/km

327 g/km

Trunk score

221 L

7.8 cu ft

259 L

9.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

144 hp/t

107 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

110 hp/t

82 kW/t

9.1 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4	Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
Consumption	9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK	13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	16.45 LC100 km	24.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	26.47 LC100 mi	39.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal	2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,468 LC/year	3,649 LC/year