Car comparison

AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q6

50 TFSI V6

299 hp2492 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

2.0 Si4

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.3 s
Fastest top speed
215 km/h
134 mph Unrestricted
207 km/h
129 mph Restricted
Highest torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Largest trunk
286 L
Best overall score
62/100
Best performance score
55/100
Best practicality score
78/100

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4

Most powerful
300 hp
224 kW
Lightest
2,083 kg
4,592 lb
Best power-to-weight
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Best estimated range
1,106 km
687 mi
Best economy score
82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
Power	299hp223kW	300hp224kW
Torque	500Nm369lb-ft	400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight	2,280kg5,027lb	2,083kg4,592lb
Gross weight	2,780kg6,129lb	3,000kg6,614lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Calculated	201 km/h 125 mph
To 99% top speed	84.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated	79.4s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.3s	7.3s
0-200 km/h	43.1s Calculated	94.8s Calculated
0-60 mph	6.9s Calculated	6.9s Calculated
Fuel consumption	10.3L/100 km22.9mpg US27.6mpg UK	9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	-	11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	-	8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.3s Calculated	15.4s Calculated
Power-to-weight	131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated	144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated	192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	683km424mi Calculated	1,106km687mi Calculated
Displacement	2,492cc152cu in	1,997cc122cu in
Length	5,099mm201in	4,879mm192in
Width	2,014mm79in	2,073mm82in
Height	1,784mm70in	1,803mm71in
Wheelbase	2,980mm117in	2,923mm115in
Front track	1,704mm67in	1,693mm67in
Rear track	1,721mm68in	1,686mm66in
Ground clearance	-	278mm11in
Trunk volume	286L	221L
Max trunk volume	2,398L	1,686L
Doors	5	5
Seats	6	7
Fuel tank	70L	104L
CO2 emissions	-	214g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.9 s	6.9 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.3 s	7.3 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	43.1 s	94.8 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph Likely limited	201 km/h 125 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.4 s	2.3 s
330 ft 101 m	6.5 s	6.4 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.9 s	9.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.8 s	12.8 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.3 s	15.4 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	147 km/h 91 mph	143 km/h 89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	299 hp 223 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	300 hp 224 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 has 1 hp more than AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	500 Nm 369 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	400 Nm 295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	2,280 kg 5,027 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	2,083 kg 4,592 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	201 km/h 125 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	7.3 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	7.3 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 has more power, AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	683 km 424 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	1,106 km 687 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	299 hp 223 kW	7.3 s	Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	300 hp 224 kW	7.3 s	201 km/h 125 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

AUDIQ650 TFSI V6

Power	299 hp 223 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 6 seats
Trunk	286 L 10.1 cu ft
Length	5,099 mm 200.7 in
Height	1,784 mm 70.2 in

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

Power	300 hp 224 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed 201 km/h 125 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	221 L 7.8 cu ft
Length	4,879 mm 192.1 in
Height	1,803 mm 71.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

AUDIQ650 TFSI V6

Power	299 hp 223 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 207 km/h129 mph

10.3 L/100 km

22.9 mpg US

27.6 mpg UK

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

Power	300 hp 224 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed 201 km/h 125 mph

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK	7.3 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK	7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ650 TFSI V6	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp	10.3 L/100 km 22.9 mpg US 27.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

AUDIQ650 TFSI V6

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

Power

299 hp

223 kW

300 hp

224 kW

Torque

500 Nm

369 lb-ft

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.3 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

215 km/h134 mph

Restricted

207 km/h129 mph

201 km/h

125 mph

Lightness

2,280 kg

5,027 lb

2,083 kg

4,592 lb

Fuel consumption

10.3 L/100 km

22.9 mpg US

27.6 mpg UK

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 6 seats
Trunk	286 L 10.1 cu ft
Length	5,099 mm 200.7 in
Height	1,784 mm 70.2 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	221 L 7.8 cu ft
Length	4,879 mm 192.1 in
Height	1,803 mm 71.0 in

Range score

683 km

424 mi

1,106 km

687 mi

CO2 score

214 g/km

Trunk score

286 L

10.1 cu ft

221 L

7.8 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

131 hp/t

98 kW/t

7.6 kg/hp

144 hp/t

107 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	AUDI Q6 50 TFSI V6	Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4
Consumption	10.3 L/100 km22.9 mpg US27.6 mpg UK	9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	17.94 LC100 km	16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	28.87 LC100 mi	26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,538 L406 US gal338 UK gal	1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,691 LC/year	2,468 LC/year