Car comparison

Cadillac XT5 3.6vsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac XT5

3.6

314 hp3649 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2016-2020
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

2.0 Si4

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac XT5 3.6

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    314 hp
    234 kW
  • Lightest
    1,931 kg
    4,257 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    850 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.4 L/100 km
    20.6 mpg US
    24.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    214 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,106 km
    687 mi
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacXT53.6Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
Power
314hp234kW
300hp224kW
Torque
368Nm271lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,931kg4,257lb
2,083kg4,592lb
Gross weight
2,550kg5,622lb
3,000kg6,614lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
201 km/h
125 mph
To 99% top speed
78.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
79.4s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
36.9s
Calculated
94.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
830km516mi
Calculated
1,106km687mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,649cc223cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,815mm190in
4,879mm192in
Width
1,903mm75in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,675mm66in
1,803mm71in
Wheelbase
2,857mm112in
2,923mm115in
Front track
1,638mm64in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,638mm64in
1,686mm66in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
278mm11in
Trunk volume
850L
221L
Max trunk volume
1,784L
1,686L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
83L
104L
CO2 emissions
229g/km
214g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac XT5 3.6Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Cadillac XT5 3.6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacXT53.66,700 rpm5,000 rpm7,200 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si45,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacXT53.6Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.9 s
94.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
201 km/h
125 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
314 hp
234 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
300 hp
224 kW

Cadillac XT5 3.6 has 14 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
1,931 kg
4,257 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
2,083 kg
4,592 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
201 km/h
125 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.67.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si47.3 s

Although Cadillac XT5 3.6 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
830 km
516 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
1,106 km
687 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacXT53.6
314 hp
234 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
300 hp
224 kW
7.3 s
201 km/h
125 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacXT53.6
Power
314 hp
234 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
850 L
30.0 cu ft
Length
4,815 mm
189.6 in
Height
1,675 mm
65.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacXT53.6
Power
314 hp
234 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Cadillac XT5 3.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacXT53.6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacXT53.6
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacXT53.6Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4
Power
314 hp
234 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
201 km/h
125 mph
Lightness
1,931 kg
4,257 lb
2,083 kg
4,592 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
850 L
30.0 cu ft
Length
4,815 mm
189.6 in
Height
1,675 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,803 mm
71.0 in
Range score
830 km
516 mi
1,106 km
687 mi
CO2 score
229 g/km
214 g/km
Trunk score
850 L
30.0 cu ft
221 L
7.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac XT5 3.6Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac XT5 3.6

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Is 152 kg lighter
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 629 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4

  • Has 32 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 276 km (172 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 15 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac XT5 3.6
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6
2.0 T6
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0 Si4
530 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021530 V6
3.6
2.0 T6
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 Si4
2.0 P300
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
3.6
4.6 V8
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
2.0 Si4
3.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
3.6
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
3.6
2.0t
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0 Si4
530 TSI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4vsVolkswagenTalagon530 TSI V6
3.6
75D 75 kWh
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsTeslaModel X75D 75 kWh
2.0 Si4
50 TFSI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4vsAUDIQ650 TFSI V6
3.6
50 71 kWh
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Cadillac XT5 3.6 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster