Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0dvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
2.0 Si4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest2,083 kg4,592 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk755 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4
- Best estimated range1,106 km687 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,083kg4,592lb | 2,083kg4,592lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,000kg6,614lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 79.4s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 94.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 846km526mi Calculated | 1,106km687mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,747mm187in | 4,879mm192in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,664mm66in | 1,803mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,923mm115in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,686mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 278mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 755L | 221L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,804L | 1,686L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 104L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 214g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 94.8 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 2,083 kg 4,592 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 2,083 kg 4,592 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 6.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 846 km 526 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 1,106 km 687 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.3 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,083 kg 4,592 lb | 2,083 kg 4,592 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 846 km 526 mi | 1,106 km 687 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 214 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 755 L 26.7 cu ft | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 534 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4
- Has 260 km (162 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























