Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8vsToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018
VS

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015

4.6 V8

309 hp4608 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    339 hp
    253 kW
  • Highest torque
    740 Nm
    546 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,592 kg
    5,714 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.8 L/100 km
    21.8 mpg US
    26.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    182 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,024 km
    636 mi
  • Largest trunk
    900 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
339hp253kW
309hp230kW
Torque
740Nm546lb-ft
439Nm324lb-ft
Curb weight
2,592kg5,714lb
2,815kg6,206lb
Gross weight-
3,350kg7,385lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
195 km/h
121 mph
To 99% top speed
95.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
98.9s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
34.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,024km636mi
Calculated
669km416mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,367cc266cu in
4,608cc281cu in
Length
5,200mm205in
4,975mm196in
Width-
1,980mm78in
Height
1,868mm74in
1,955mm77in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,850mm112in
Front track
1,693mm67in
1,650mm65in
Rear track
1,685mm66in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
220mm9in
-
Trunk volume
900L
259L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
86L
93L
CO2 emissions
182g/km
327g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.7 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
195 km/h
121 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
134 km/h
83 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
309 hp
230 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 has 30 hp more than Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
439 Nm
324 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
2,592 kg
5,714 lb
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
2,815 kg
6,206 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
195 km/h
121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V87.2 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V88.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 5.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
1,024 km
636 mi
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
669 km
416 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
7.2 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
309 hp
230 kW
8.6 s
195 km/h
121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
309 hp
230 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,955 mm
77.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
309 hp
230 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.2 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
309 hp
230 kW
Torque
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
439 Nm
324 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Lightness
2,592 kg
5,714 lb
2,815 kg
6,206 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,955 mm
77.0 in
Range score
1,024 km
636 mi
669 km
416 mi
CO2 score
182 g/km
327 g/km
Trunk score
900 L
31.8 cu ft
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km24.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi39.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year3,649 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 301 Nm more
  • Is 223 kg lighter
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 355 km (220 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 641 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 145 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) 4.6 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
4.6 V8
3.6
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsCadillacXT53.6
4.4 V8
570 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
4.4 V8
75D 75 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsTeslaModel X75D 75 kWh
4.6 V8
3.6 FSI V6
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
4.6 V8
2.5
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
4.6 V8
2.0 T6
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
4.4 V8
40i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)40i
4.6 V8
530 TSI V6
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsVolkswagenTalagon530 TSI V6
4.4 V8
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
4.6 V8
50 71 kWh
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 vs Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster