Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2017-2018

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
5.9 s
Fastest top speed
240 km/h
149 mph Unrestricted
230 km/h
143 mph Restricted
Lightest
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
Best power-to-weight
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
181 g/km
Best economy score
86/100

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8

Most powerful
339 hp
253 kW
Highest torque
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
Best estimated range
1,024 km
636 mi
Largest trunk
900 L
Best overall score
72/100
Best performance score
62/100
Best practicality score
93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
Power	310hp231kW	339hp253kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	740Nm546lb-ft
Curb weight	1,941kg4,279lb	2,592kg5,714lb
Gross weight	2,450kg5,401lb	-
Top speed	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	70.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated	107.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	5.9s	7.2s
0-200 km/h	23.6s Calculated	37.5s Calculated
0-60 mph	5.6s Calculated	6.8s Calculated
Fuel consumption	7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK	8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK	10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK	7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile	14.1s Calculated	15.2s Calculated
Power-to-weight	160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated	131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated	285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	910km566mi Calculated	1,024km636mi Calculated
Displacement	1,969cc120cu in	4,367cc266cu in
Length	4,688mm185in	5,200mm205in
Width	1,902mm75in	2,073mm82in
Height	1,658mm65in	1,868mm74in
Wheelbase	2,865mm113in	3,120mm123in
Front track	1,668mm66in	1,693mm67in
Rear track	1,673mm66in	1,685mm66in
Ground clearance	216mm9in	220mm9in
Trunk volume	505L	900L
Max trunk volume	1,432L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	71L	86L
CO2 emissions	181g/km	182g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	5.6 s	6.8 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	5.9 s	7.2 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	23.6 s	37.5 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.3 s	2.3 s
330 ft 101 m	6.1 s	6.4 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.2 s	9.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	11.8 s	12.7 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.1 s	15.2 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	164 km/h 102 mph	147 km/h 91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	310 hp 231 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	339 hp 253 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 has 29 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	400 Nm 295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	740 Nm 546 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	1,941 kg 4,279 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	2,592 kg 5,714 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	5.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	7.2 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	910 km 566 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	1,024 km 636 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	310 hp 231 kW	5.9 s	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	339 hp 253 kW	7.2 s	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	5.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	505 L 17.8 cu ft
Length	4,688 mm 184.6 in
Height	1,658 mm 65.3 in

Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8

Power	339 hp 253 kW
0-100 km/h	7.2 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	900 L 31.8 cu ft
Length	5,200 mm 204.7 in
Height	1,868 mm 73.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	5.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

7.8 L/100 km

30.2 mpg US

36.2 mpg UK

Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8

Power	339 hp 253 kW
0-100 km/h	7.2 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

8.4 L/100 km

28.0 mpg US

33.6 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK	5.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK	7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp	8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6

Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 V8

Power

310 hp

231 kW

339 hp

253 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

740 Nm

546 lb-ft

Acceleration

5.9 s

7.2 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

240 km/h149 mph

Restricted

230 km/h143 mph

Unrestricted

230 km/h143 mph

Restricted

220 km/h137 mph

Lightness

1,941 kg

4,279 lb

2,592 kg

5,714 lb

Fuel consumption

7.8 L/100 km

30.2 mpg US

36.2 mpg UK

8.4 L/100 km

28.0 mpg US

33.6 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	505 L 17.8 cu ft
Length	4,688 mm 184.6 in
Height	1,658 mm 65.3 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	900 L 31.8 cu ft
Length	5,200 mm 204.7 in
Height	1,868 mm 73.5 in

Range score

910 km

566 mi

1,024 km

636 mi

CO2 score

181 g/km

182 g/km

Trunk score

505 L

17.8 cu ft

900 L

31.8 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

160 hp/t

119 kW/t

6.3 kg/hp

131 hp/t

98 kW/t

7.6 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6	Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 V8
Consumption	7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK	8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	13.65 LC100 km	14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	21.97 LC100 mi	23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal	1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,048 LC/year	2,205 LC/year