Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

4.4 SDV8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
5.9 s
Fastest top speed
240 km/h
149 mph Unrestricted
230 km/h
143 mph Restricted
Lightest
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
Best power-to-weight
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
181 g/km
Best performance score
61/100
Best economy score
86/100

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

Most powerful
339 hp
253 kW
Highest torque
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
Best estimated range
915 km
568 mi
Best overall score
70/100
Best practicality score
92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power	310hp231kW	339hp253kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	740Nm546lb-ft
Curb weight	2,016kg4,445lb	2,583kg5,695lb
Gross weight	-	3,340kg7,363lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated	217 km/h 135 mph
To 99% top speed	71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated	103.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	5.9s	7.5s
0-200 km/h	23.8s Calculated	47.6s Calculated
0-60 mph	5.6s Calculated	7.0s Calculated
Fuel consumption	7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK	9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK	-
Fuel consumption highway	6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK	-
Quarter mile	14.1s Calculated	15.5s Calculated
Power-to-weight	154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated	131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated	286Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	910km566mi Calculated	915km568mi Calculated
Displacement	1,969cc120cu in	4,367cc266cu in
Length	4,688mm185in	5,200mm205in
Width	1,902mm75in	2,073mm82in
Height	1,658mm65in	1,868mm74in
Wheelbase	2,865mm113in	3,120mm123in
Front track	-	1,693mm67in
Rear track	-	1,685mm66in
Ground clearance	216mm9in	297mm12in
Trunk volume	505L	-
Max trunk volume	1,432L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	71L	86L
CO2 emissions	181g/km	247g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	5,700 rpm	2,220-5,100 rpm	6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	3,500 rpm	1,750-2,250 rpm	3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	5.6 s	7.0 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	5.9 s	7.5 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	23.8 s	47.6 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited	217 km/h 135 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.3 s	2.3 s
330 ft 101 m	6.1 s	6.4 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.2 s	9.9 s
1000 ft 305 m	11.8 s	12.9 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.1 s	15.5 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	163 km/h 101 mph	143 km/h 89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	310 hp 231 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	339 hp 253 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has 29 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	400 Nm 295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	740 Nm 546 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	2,016 kg 4,445 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	2,583 kg 5,695 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	217 km/h 135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	5.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	7.5 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	910 km 566 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	915 km 568 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	310 hp 231 kW	5.9 s	Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	339 hp 253 kW	7.5 s	217 km/h 135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	5.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	505 L 17.8 cu ft
Length	4,688 mm 184.6 in
Height	1,658 mm 65.3 in

Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8

Power	339 hp 253 kW
0-100 km/h	7.5 s
Top speed 217 km/h 135 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,200 mm 204.7 in
Height	1,868 mm 73.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	5.9 s
Top speed Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph

7.8 L/100 km

30.2 mpg US

36.2 mpg UK

Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8

Power	339 hp 253 kW
0-100 km/h	7.5 s
Top speed 217 km/h 135 mph

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK	5.9 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK	7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6	154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp	7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8	131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6

Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8

Power

310 hp

231 kW

339 hp

253 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

740 Nm

546 lb-ft

Acceleration

5.9 s

7.5 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

240 km/h149 mph

Restricted

230 km/h143 mph

217 km/h

135 mph

Lightness

2,016 kg

4,445 lb

2,583 kg

5,695 lb

Fuel consumption

7.8 L/100 km

30.2 mpg US

36.2 mpg UK

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	505 L 17.8 cu ft
Length	4,688 mm 184.6 in
Height	1,658 mm 65.3 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,200 mm 204.7 in
Height	1,868 mm 73.5 in

Range score

910 km

566 mi

915 km

568 mi

CO2 score

181 g/km

247 g/km

Trunk score

505 L

17.8 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

154 hp/t

115 kW/t

6.5 kg/hp

131 hp/t

98 kW/t

7.6 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6	Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8
Consumption	7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK	9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	13.65 LC100 km	16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	21.97 LC100 mi	26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal	1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,048 LC/year	2,468 LC/year