Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Lexus LX III · Facelift 2015 570 V8vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017
4.4 SDV8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Lightest2,583 kg5,695 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions247 g/km
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score82/100
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range958 km595 mi
- Best practicality score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,740kg6,041lb | 2,583kg5,695lb |
| Gross weight | 3,350kg7,385lb | 3,340kg7,363lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 109.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 103.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.9s Calculated | 47.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 958km595mi Calculated | 915km568mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,663cc346cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 5,065mm199in | 5,200mm205in |
| Width | 1,980mm78in | 2,073mm82in |
| Height | 1,910mm75in | 1,868mm74in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,693mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,635mm64in | 1,685mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 225mm9in | 297mm12in |
| Trunk volume | 701L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 138L | 86L |
| CO2 emissions | 334g/km | 247g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,250 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.9 s | 47.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has 28 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 2,740 kg 6,041 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 2,583 kg 5,695 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 7.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 7.5 s |
Although Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 and Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 958 km 595 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 915 km 568 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 7.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8 | Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,740 kg 6,041 lb | 2,583 kg 5,695 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 958 km 595 mi | 915 km 568 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 334 g/km | 247 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 701 L 24.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8 | Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.20 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,780 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lexus LX III Facelift 2015 570 V8
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 43 km (27 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8
- Has 210 Nm more
- Is 157 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 87 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























