Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

4.4 SDV8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lightest
    2,146 kg
    4,731 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    192 g/km
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
310hp231kW
339hp253kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
740Nm546lb-ft
Curb weight
2,146kg4,731lb
2,583kg5,695lb
Gross weight-
3,340kg7,363lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
103.0s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
30.2s
Calculated
47.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
286Nm/t192lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
855km532mi
Calculated
915km568mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
5,200mm205in
Width
1,923mm76in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,868mm74in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
3,120mm123in
Front track
1,673mm66in
1,693mm67in
Rear track
1,675mm66in
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
297mm12in
Trunk volume
314L
-
Max trunk volume
1,886L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
86L
CO2 emissions
192g/km
247g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV83,500 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.2 s
47.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
339 hp
253 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has 29 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
740 Nm
546 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
2,583 kg
5,695 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
915 km
568 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
339 hp
253 kW
7.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20174.4 SDV8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
2,583 kg
5,695 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,200 mm
204.7 in
Height
1,868 mm
73.5 in
Range score
855 km
532 mi
915 km
568 mi
CO2 score
192 g/km
247 g/km
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km16.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi26.47 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,468 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 437 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 55 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8

  • Has 29 hp more
  • Has 340 Nm more
  • Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 SDV8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 4.4 SDV8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster