Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0dvsMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015

2.2d

175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    208 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    134 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,176 km
    731 mi
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace2.0dMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
180hp134kW
175hp130kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,480kg3,263lb
Gross weight-
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
94.8s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
61.8s
Calculated
61.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,176km731mi
Calculated
1,115km693mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
2,191cc134cu in
Length
4,746mm187in
4,555mm179in
Width
2,070mm81in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,667mm66in
1,710mm67in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,641mm65in
-
Rear track
1,654mm65in
-
Ground clearance
213mm8in
210mm8in
Trunk volume
650L
503L
Max trunk volume-
1,620L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
58L
CO2 emissions
134g/km
136g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0dMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dPowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d4,500 rpm2,000 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace2.0dMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
61.8 s
61.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d has 5 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
207 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d8.5 s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
1,176 km
731 mi
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,115 km
693 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.5 s
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
8.8 s
207 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.5 s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace2.0dMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
175 hp
130 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.8 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Range score
1,176 km
731 mi
1,115 km
693 mi
CO2 score
134 g/km
136 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 2.0dMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 147 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 2 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Is 240 kg lighter
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.2d
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.0d
2.0 P200
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P200
2.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.2d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0d
2.2d
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
2.2d
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0d
2.0 D4
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.2d
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.0d
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0dvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d vs Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d - car comparison - FastVsFaster