Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight105 hp/t78 kW/t9.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,176 km731 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,872kg4,127lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.8s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 86.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 61.8s Calculated | 66.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,176km731mi Calculated | 1,058km657mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,746mm187in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 2,070mm81in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,667mm66in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 61.8 s | 66.9 s |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,176 km 731 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,058 km 657 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,176 km 731 mi | 1,058 km 657 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 152 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 119 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























