Seat Tarraco
Car comparison
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,071 km666 mi
- Best performance score47/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,872kg4,127lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.8s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.9s Calculated | 66.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,071km666mi Calculated | 1,058km657mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,735mm186in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 230L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 700L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 147g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.9 s | 66.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 1,071 km 666 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,058 km 657 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,872 kg 4,127 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,071 km 666 mi | 1,058 km 657 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 147 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 230 L 8.1 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Is 102 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 275 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























