Car comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2dvsHyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015

2.2d

175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017
VS

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015

2.2 CRDi

200 hp2199 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    207 km/h
    129 mph
  • Lightest
    1,480 kg
    3,263 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    136 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,115 km
    693 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Power
175hp130kW
200hp149kW
Torque
420Nm310lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,480kg3,263lb
1,939kg4,275lb
Gross weight
2,110kg4,652lb
2,510kg5,534lb
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
93.0s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
61.5s
Calculated
83.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,115km693mi
Calculated
1,067km663mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,191cc134cu in
2,199cc134cu in
Length
4,555mm179in
4,690mm185in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,680mm66in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,700mm106in
Front track-
1,633mm64in
Rear track-
1,644mm65in
Ground clearance
210mm8in
185mm7in
Trunk volume
503L
585L
Max trunk volume
1,620L
1,680L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
64L
CO2 emissions
136g/km
159g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dHyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDiPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d4,500 rpm2,000 rpm4,750 rpm
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi3,800 rpm1,750-2,750 rpm4,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
61.5 s
83.5 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
200 hp
149 kW

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi has 25 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
1,939 kg
4,275 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
207 km/h
129 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
203 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d8.8 s
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi9.0 s

Although Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi has more power, Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,115 km
693 mi
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
1,067 km
663 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
8.8 s
207 km/h
129 mph
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
200 hp
149 kW
9.0 s
203 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
585 L
20.7 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDi
Power
175 hp
130 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
9.0 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
1,939 kg
4,275 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
585 L
20.7 cu ft
Length
4,690 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,680 mm
66.1 in
Range score
1,115 km
693 mi
1,067 km
663 mi
CO2 score
136 g/km
159 g/km
Trunk score
503 L
17.8 cu ft
585 L
20.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dHyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Is 459 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 49 km (30 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 23 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 82 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) 2.2 CRDi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2d
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-32.0i
2.2 CRDi
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
2.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
2.2 CRDi
1.6T
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsHyundaiKona II1.6T
2.2d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2 CRDi
2.0 D4
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.2d
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.2d
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.2 CRDi
2.0 TDI
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2 CRDi
2.0 TDI
VS
HyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20152.2 CRDivsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.2d
2.0 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d vs Hyundai Santa Fe III (DM) · Facelift 2015 2.2 CRDi - car comparison - FastVsFaster