Volkswagen Sharan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIvsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Lightest1,734 kg3,823 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,061 km659 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score89/100
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,734kg3,823lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,505kg5,523lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 106.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.2s Calculated | 53.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 1,061km659mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,854mm191in | 4,903mm193in |
| Width | 1,904mm75in | 2,154mm85in |
| Height | 1,720mm68in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,919mm115in | - |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,617mm64in | - |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,297L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 196g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.2 s | 53.4 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.3 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,061 km 659 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 1,061 km 659 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 196 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 227 km (141 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























