Car comparison

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.2 Duratorq TDCi

200 hpDieselFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.5 s
Fastest top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightest
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Best power-to-weight
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Largest trunk
432 L
Best economy score
90/100
Best practicality score
84/100

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi

Most powerful
200 hp
149 kW
Best estimated range
1,061 km
659 mi
Best overall score
58/100
Best performance score
47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power	182hp136kW	200hp149kW
Torque	240Nm177lb-ft	-
Curb weight	1,310kg2,888lb	1,734kg3,823lb
Gross weight	1,900kg4,189lb	2,505kg5,523lb
Top speed	217 km/h 135 mph	215 km/h 134 mph
To 99% top speed	88.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated	105.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.5s	8.6s
0-200 km/h	44.3s Calculated	53.1s Calculated
0-60 mph	8.0s Calculated	8.1s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK	6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK	8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK	5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.2s Calculated	16.2s Calculated
Power-to-weight	139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated	115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated	-
Estimated range	887km551mi Calculated	1,061km659mi Calculated
Displacement	1,596cc97cu in	-
Length	4,380mm172in	4,903mm193in
Width	1,828mm72in	2,154mm85in
Height	1,626mm64in	1,660mm65in
Wheelbase	2,648mm104in	-
Front track	1,559mm61in	-
Rear track	1,569mm62in	-
Trunk volume	432L	285L
Max trunk volume	1,723L	2,000L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	7
Fuel tank	55L	70L
CO2 emissions	144g/km	-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.0 s	8.1 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.5 s	8.6 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	44.3 s	53.1 s
Top speed	217 km/h 135 mph	215 km/h 134 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.7 s	2.5 s
330 ft 101 m	7.0 s	6.9 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.6 s	10.5 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.6 s	13.6 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.2 s	16.2 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	143 km/h 89 mph	139 km/h 86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	182 hp 136 kW
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	200 hp 149 kW

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi has 18 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 18 hp (13 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	1,310 kg 2,888 lb
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	1,734 kg 3,823 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	217 km/h 135 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	215 km/h 134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	8.5 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	8.6 s

Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi has more power, Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	887 km 551 mi
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	1,061 km 659 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	182 hp 136 kW	8.5 s	217 km/h 135 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	200 hp 149 kW	8.6 s	215 km/h 134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost

Power	182 hp 136 kW
0-100 km/h	8.5 s
Top speed 217 km/h 135 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	432 L 15.3 cu ft
Length	4,380 mm 172.4 in
Height	1,626 mm 64.0 in

FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 215 km/h 134 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	285 L 10.1 cu ft
Length	4,903 mm 193.0 in
Height	1,660 mm 65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost

Power	182 hp 136 kW
0-100 km/h	8.5 s
Top speed 217 km/h 135 mph

6.2 L/100 km

37.9 mpg US

45.6 mpg UK

FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi

Power	200 hp 149 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 215 km/h 134 mph

6.6 L/100 km

35.6 mpg US

42.8 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK	8.5 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK	8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost	139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp	6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi	115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp	6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost

FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi

Power

182 hp

136 kW

200 hp

149 kW

Torque

240 Nm

177 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.5 s

8.6 s

Top speed

217 km/h

135 mph

215 km/h

134 mph

Lightness

1,310 kg

2,888 lb

1,734 kg

3,823 lb

Fuel consumption

6.2 L/100 km

37.9 mpg US

45.6 mpg UK

6.6 L/100 km

35.6 mpg US

42.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	432 L 15.3 cu ft
Length	4,380 mm 172.4 in
Height	1,626 mm 64.0 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	285 L 10.1 cu ft
Length	4,903 mm 193.0 in
Height	1,660 mm 65.4 in

Range score

887 km

551 mi

1,061 km

659 mi

CO2 score

144 g/km

Trunk score

432 L

15.3 cu ft

285 L

10.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

139 hp/t

104 kW/t

7.2 kg/hp

115 hp/t

86 kW/t

8.7 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost	Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Consumption	6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK	6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	10.85 LC100 km	11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	17.46 LC100 mi	18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	930 L246 US gal205 UK gal	990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,628 LC/year	1,733 LC/year