BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220dvsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord C-MAX II
1.6 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Best estimated range1,133 km704 mi
- Largest trunk468 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.7s Calculated | 44.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,133km704mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,555mm61in | 1,626mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 468L | 432L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,723L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d: Power / Torque
- Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.7 s | 44.5 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d has 8 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 7.6 s |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,133 km 704 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d | Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 246 km (153 mi) more estimated range
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























