Car comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220dvsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)

220d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2014-2018
VS

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.1 L/100 km
    57.4 mpg US
    68.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    119 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,133 km
    704 mi
  • Largest trunk
    468 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220dFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
190hp142kW
182hp136kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,405kg3,097lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
1,955kg4,310lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
81.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
33.7s
Calculated
44.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,133km704mi
Calculated
887km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,596cc97cu in
Length
4,342mm171in
4,380mm172in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,555mm61in
1,626mm64in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
-
Trunk volume
468L
432L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
1,723L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
55L
CO2 emissions
119g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220dFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d4,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220dFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.7 s
44.5 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
190 hp
142 kW
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d has 8 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
227 km/h
141 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
1,133 km
704 mi
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
227 km/h
141 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,342 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,555 mm
61.2 in
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.6 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220dFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
190 hp
142 kW
182 hp
136 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.5 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,342 mm
170.9 in
Height
1,555 mm
61.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Range score
1,133 km
704 mi
887 km
551 mi
CO2 score
119 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
468 L
16.5 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220dFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 246 km (153 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 36 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 25 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Is 95 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d vs Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster