Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCivsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi

  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Largest trunk
    700 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCiFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
210hp157kW
182hp136kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,766kg3,893lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,575kg5,677lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
101.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
88.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
48.1s
Calculated
44.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,273km791mi
Calculated
887km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,596cc97cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,380mm172in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,626mm64in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
150mm6in
-
Trunk volume
700L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,200L
1,723L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
55L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCiFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCiFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.1 s
44.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has 28 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 28 hp (21 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi8.8 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost8.5 s

Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has more power, Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.8 s
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.8 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCiFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
210 hp
157 kW
182 hp
136 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Range score
1,273 km
791 mi
887 km
551 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
700 L
24.7 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II 2.0 TDCiFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 28 hp more
  • Has 210 Nm more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 386 km (240 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 268 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Is 456 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 TDCi
220d
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
220d
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi vs Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster