Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCivsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.2 Duratorq TDCi

200 hpDieselFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi

  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Largest trunk
    700 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCiFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
210hp157kW
200hp149kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,766kg3,893lb
1,734kg3,823lb
Gross weight
2,575kg5,677lb
2,505kg5,523lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
101.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
105.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
48.1s
Calculated
53.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
1,273km791mi
Calculated
1,061km659mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
-
Length
4,796mm189in
4,903mm193in
Width
1,916mm75in
2,154mm85in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
-
Front track
1,606mm63in
-
Rear track
1,606mm63in
-
Ground clearance
150mm6in
-
Trunk volume
700L
285L
Max trunk volume
2,200L
2,000L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCiFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.1 s
53.1 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
200 hp
149 kW

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has 10 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 10 hp (7 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1,734 kg
3,823 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
218 km/h
135 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1,061 km
659 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.8 s
218 km/h
135 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
200 hp
149 kW
8.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.8 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCiFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
1,734 kg
3,823 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
1,273 km
791 mi
1,061 km
659 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
-
Trunk score
700 L
24.7 cu ft
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II 2.0 TDCiFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 212 km (132 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 415 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi

  • Is 32 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Ford S-MAX 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi vs Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster