Ford S-MAX II
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCivsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
- Largest trunk700 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Lightest1,734 kg3,823 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,766kg3,893lb | 1,734kg3,823lb |
| Gross weight | 2,575kg5,677lb | 2,505kg5,523lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.1s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 105.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.1s Calculated | 53.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 1,273km791mi Calculated | 1,061km659mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 4,903mm193in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 2,154mm85in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | - |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 700L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,200L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.1 s | 53.1 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has 10 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi.
The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 8.8 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 8.6 s |
Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,061 km 659 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.8 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,273 km 791 mi | 1,061 km 659 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 212 km (132 mi) more estimated range
- Has 415 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Is 32 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























