Car comparison

Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20VvsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX

2.5 i 20V

220 hp2522 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2006-2010
VS

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.2 Duratorq TDCi

200 hpDieselFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Lightest
    1,681 kg
    3,706 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    854 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,061 km
    659 mi
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX2.5 i 20VFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
220hp164kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,681kg3,706lb
1,734kg3,823lb
Gross weight
2,420kg5,335lb
2,505kg5,523lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
101.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
105.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
37.5s
Calculated
53.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
745km463mi
Calculated
1,061km659mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,522cc154cu in
-
Length
4,768mm188in
4,903mm193in
Width
1,884mm74in
2,154mm85in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
-
Front track
1,589mm63in
-
Rear track
1,605mm63in
-
Trunk volume
854L
285L
Max trunk volume
2,100L
2,000L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
7
Fuel tank
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX2.5 i 20VFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.5 s
53.1 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
220 hp
164 kW
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
200 hp
149 kW

Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V has 20 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V: 20 hp (15 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
1,681 kg
3,706 lb
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1,734 kg
3,823 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
230 km/h
143 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V7.9 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V: 2.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
745 km
463 mi
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1,061 km
659 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
220 hp
164 kW
7.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
200 hp
149 kW
8.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
854 L
30.2 cu ft
Length
4,768 mm
187.7 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
7.9 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX2.5 i 20VFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
220 hp
164 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,681 kg
3,706 lb
1,734 kg
3,823 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
854 L
30.2 cu ft
Length
4,768 mm
187.7 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
745 km
463 mi
1,061 km
659 mi
Trunk score
854 L
30.2 cu ft
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX 2.5 i 20VFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 53 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 569 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi

  • Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 316 km (196 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V
Ford S-MAX 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20VvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.5 i 20V
3.5 V6
VS
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20VvsRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.5 i 20V
B 200 Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20VvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
1.4 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.5 i 20V
B 200 Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX2.5 i 20VvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)B 200 Turbo
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V vs Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster