Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk965 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Lightest1,734 kg3,823 lb
- Best estimated range1,061 km659 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,876kg4,136lb | 1,734kg3,823lb |
| Gross weight | 2,600kg5,732lb | 2,505kg5,523lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 107.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 106.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.1s Calculated | 53.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 1,050km652mi Calculated | 1,061km659mi Calculated |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 4,903mm193in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 2,154mm85in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | - |
| Trunk volume | 965L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,020L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.1 s | 53.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 240 hp 179 kW |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has 40 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi.
The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 40 hp (30 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 1,876 kg 4,136 lb |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 8.6 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 8.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 1,050 km 652 mi |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 1,061 km 659 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,876 kg 4,136 lb | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,050 km 652 mi | 1,061 km 659 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 965 L 34.1 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 680 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
- Is 142 kg lighter
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























