Car comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223ivsFord S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)

223i

204 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2021-present
VS

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,050 km
    652 mi
  • Largest trunk
    965 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Lightest
    1,545 kg
    3,406 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223iFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
204hp152kW
240hp179kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,545kg3,406lb
1,876kg4,136lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,600kg5,732lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
106.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
27.9s
Calculated
40.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
682km424mi
Calculated
1,050km652mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
-
Length
4,386mm173in
4,796mm189in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,576mm62in
1,655mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,850mm112in
Front track
1,586mm62in
-
Rear track
1,587mm62in
-
Ground clearance
171mm7in
-
Trunk volume
415L
965L
Max trunk volume
1,405L
2,020L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
45L
63L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223iFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluePowerTorque
  • BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i: Power / Torque
  • Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i5,000-6,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,750 rpm
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223iFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.9 s
40.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
97 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has 36 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 36 hp (27 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,876 kg
4,136 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
241 km/h
150 mph
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
682 km
424 mi
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,050 km
652 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
204 hp
152 kW
7.0 s
241 km/h
150 mph
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,576 mm
62.0 in
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.0 s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223iFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
204 hp
152 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
8.6 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,545 kg
3,406 lb
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,386 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,576 mm
62.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Range score
682 km
424 mi
1,050 km
652 mi
Trunk score
415 L
14.7 cu ft
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223iFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i

  • Is 331 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Has 36 hp more
  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 368 km (229 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 550 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i vs Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue - car comparison - FastVsFaster