BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223ivsFord S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX II · Facelift 2019
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,050 km652 mi
- Largest trunk965 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score95/100
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,876kg4,136lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,600kg5,732lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 106.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.9s Calculated | 40.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 1,050km652mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,386mm173in | 4,796mm189in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,576mm62in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 171mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 415L | 965L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,405L | 2,020L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i: Power / Torque
- Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.9 s | 40.0 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 204 hp 152 kW |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 240 hp 179 kW |
Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has 36 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 1,876 kg 4,136 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 7.0 s |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 8.6 s |
Although Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 682 km 424 mi |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 1,050 km 652 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.0 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i | FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,876 kg 4,136 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 1,050 km 652 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | 965 L 34.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i | Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223i
- Is 331 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 368 km (229 mi) more estimated range
- Has 550 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























