Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,050 km
    652 mi
  • Largest trunk
    965 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,661 kg
    3,662 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque-
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
1,876kg4,136lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,600kg5,732lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
105.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
106.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
35.8s
Calculated
40.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
843km524mi
Calculated
1,050km652mi
Calculated
Length
4,903mm193in
4,796mm189in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,655mm65in
Wheelbase-
2,850mm112in
Trunk volume
285L
965L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
2,020L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
63L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.8 s
40.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,876 kg
4,136 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
235 km/h
146 mph
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost7.9 s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
843 km
524 mi
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,050 km
652 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.9 s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
-
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Range score
843 km
524 mi
1,050 km
652 mi
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 215 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 207 km (128 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 680 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
223i
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
2.0 EcoBoost
225i
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue - car comparison - FastVsFaster