Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsRenault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II)

3.5 V6

241 hp3498 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedMinivan / MPV2006-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Lightest
    1,661 kg
    3,662 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    843 km
    524 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    80/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
240hp179kW
241hp180kW
Torque-
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
1,845kg4,068lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,545kg5,611lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
105.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
109.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
35.8s
Calculated
43.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
843km524mi
Calculated
692km430mi
Calculated
Displacement-
3,498cc213cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,656mm183in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,728mm68in
Wheelbase-
2,803mm110in
Front track-
1,574mm62in
Rear track-
1,556mm61in
Ground clearance-
120mm5in
Trunk volume
285L
291L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
2,860L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
7
Fuel tank
70L
83L
CO2 emissions-
284g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.8 s
43.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
241 hp
180 kW

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 has 1 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
1,845 kg
4,068 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost7.9 s
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V68.1 s

Although Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 3.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
843 km
524 mi
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
692 km
430 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
241 hp
180 kW
8.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
291 L
10.3 cu ft
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,728 mm
68.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.9 s
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
241 hp
180 kW
Torque
-
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
291 L
10.3 cu ft
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,728 mm
68.0 in
Range score
843 km
524 mi
692 km
430 mi
CO2 score
-
284 g/km
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
291 L
10.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostRenault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km21.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi33.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year3,150 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 184 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 152 km (94 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
3.5i V6 24V
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsRenaultEspace IV3.5i V6 24V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
3.5 V6
1.8 Energy TCe
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsRenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
B 200 Turbo
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
B 200 Turbo
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)B 200 Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
3.5 V6
1.4 TSI
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster