Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Volkswagen Sharan II

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,661 kg
    3,662 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    843 km
    524 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
240hp179kW
200hp149kW
Torque-
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
1,790kg3,946lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
106.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
100.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
36.0s
Calculated
47.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
843km524mi
Calculated
833km518mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,854mm191in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,904mm75in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,720mm68in
Wheelbase-
2,919mm115in
Front track-
1,569mm62in
Rear track-
1,617mm64in
Trunk volume
285L
885L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
2,430L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions-
196g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.0 s
47.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 40 hp (30 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
1,790 kg
3,946 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
235 km/h
146 mph
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost7.9 s
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI8.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
843 km
524 mi
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
833 km
518 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
8.3 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
885 L
31.3 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.9 s
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
-
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
885 L
31.3 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Range score
843 km
524 mi
833 km
518 mi
CO2 score
-
196 g/km
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
885 L
31.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Is 129 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI

  • Has 600 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster