Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    959 km
    596 mi
  • Largest trunk
    955 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    96/100

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,661 kg
    3,662 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    54/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
240hp179kW
220hp164kW
Torque-
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
1,715kg3,781lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
106.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
96.0s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
36.0s
Calculated
38.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
843km524mi
Calculated
959km596mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,854mm191in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,904mm75in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,746mm69in
Wheelbase-
2,920mm115in
Front track-
1,571mm62in
Rear track-
1,617mm64in
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume
285L
955L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
2,430L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.0 s
38.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 20 hp (15 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
1,715 kg
3,781 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
235 km/h
146 mph
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
226 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost7.9 s
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI7.8 s

Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
843 km
524 mi
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
959 km
596 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
235 km/h
146 mph
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.8 s
226 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,746 mm
68.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.9 s
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
-
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,746 mm
68.7 in
Range score
843 km
524 mi
959 km
596 mi
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostVolkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 54 kg lighter
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 670 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
2.0 TSI
220i
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
2.0 TSI
220d
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster