Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023
VS

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

203 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,050 km
    652 mi
  • Largest trunk
    965 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240hp179kW
203hp151kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,876kg4,136lb
1,661kg3,662lb
Gross weight
2,600kg5,732lb
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
221 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
106.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
40.0s
Calculated
46.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
1,050km652mi
Calculated
864km537mi
Calculated
Length
4,796mm189in
4,903mm193in
Width
1,916mm75in
2,154mm85in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
-
Trunk volume
965L
285L
Max trunk volume
2,020L
2,000L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
63L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.0 s
46.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
221 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has 37 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 37 hp (28 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
221 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue8.6 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost8.5 s

Although Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,050 km
652 mi
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
864 km
537 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW
8.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
203 hp
151 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
1,050 km
652 mi
864 km
537 mi
Trunk score
965 L
34.1 cu ft
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Has 37 hp more
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 186 km (115 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 680 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 215 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
223i
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
3.5 V6
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue vs Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster