Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsToyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023
VS

Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018

3.5 V6

300 hp3456 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedMinivan / MPV2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,876 kg
    4,136 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,050 km
    652 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
240hp179kW
300hp224kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
361Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,876kg4,136lb
2,125kg4,685lb
Gross weight
2,600kg5,732lb
2,675kg5,897lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
107.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
95.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
40.1s
Calculated
56.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,050km652mi
Calculated
619km385mi
Calculated
Displacement-
3,456cc211cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,945mm195in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,850mm73in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,945mm77in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
3,000mm118in
Ground clearance-
160mm6in
Trunk volume
965L
-
Max trunk volume
2,020L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
63L
65L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueToyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6PowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V66,600 rpm4,600-4,700 rpm6,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.1 s
56.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 has 60 hp more than Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
361 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2,125 kg
4,685 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 4.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,050 km
652 mi
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
619 km
385 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
300 hp
224 kW
8.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,945 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,945 mm
76.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.6 s
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
361 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
2,125 kg
4,685 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,945 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,945 mm
76.6 in
Range score
1,050 km
652 mi
619 km
385 mi
Trunk score
965 L
34.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueToyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Has 139 Nm more
  • Is 249 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 431 km (268 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Toyota Alphard III 3.5 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue vs Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster