Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023
VS

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,050 km
    652 mi
  • Largest trunk
    965 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
240hp179kW
182hp136kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,876kg4,136lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,600kg5,732lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
106.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
88.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
40.0s
Calculated
44.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,050km652mi
Calculated
887km551mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,596cc97cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,380mm172in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,626mm64in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,648mm104in
Front track-
1,559mm61in
Rear track-
1,569mm62in
Trunk volume
965L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,020L
1,723L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
55L
CO2 emissions-
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.0 s
44.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has 58 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 58 hp (43 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue8.6 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost8.5 s

Although Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has more power, Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,050 km
652 mi
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
182 hp
136 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Range score
1,050 km
652 mi
887 km
551 mi
CO2 score
-
144 g/km
Trunk score
965 L
34.1 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Has 58 hp more
  • Has 260 Nm more
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 163 km (101 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 533 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Is 566 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
223i
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
1.6 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
3.5 V6
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
225i
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue vs Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster