Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCivsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.2 Duratorq TDCi

200 hpDieselFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,444 kg
    3,183 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Largest trunk
    432 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCiFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
200hp149kW
170hp127kW
Torque-
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,734kg3,823lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight
2,505kg5,523lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
105.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
87.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
53.1s
Calculated
50.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,061km659mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,379mm172in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,610mm63in
Wheelbase-
2,648mm104in
Front track-
1,557mm61in
Rear track-
1,569mm62in
Trunk volume
285L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
1,684L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCiFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
53.1 s
50.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
200 hp
149 kW
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi has 30 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 30 hp (22 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1,734 kg
3,823 lb
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
215 km/h
134 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi8.6 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s

Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi has more power, Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1,061 km
659 mi
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
200 hp
149 kW
8.6 s
215 km/h
134 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCiFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
-
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.5 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,734 kg
3,823 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Range score
1,061 km
659 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCiFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Is 290 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 189 km (118 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 147 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.2 Duratorq TDCi
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
1.8 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
1.4 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCivsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.2 Duratorq TDCi vs Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster