Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

203 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Lightest
    1,444 kg
    3,183 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Largest trunk
    432 L
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    221 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    203 hp
    151 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    122 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
203hp151kW
170hp127kW
Torque-
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
87.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
46.5s
Calculated
50.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
864km537mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,379mm172in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,610mm63in
Wheelbase-
2,648mm104in
Front track-
1,557mm61in
Rear track-
1,569mm62in
Trunk volume
285L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
1,684L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.5 s
50.3 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 33 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 33 hp (25 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
221 km/h
137 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
864 km
537 mi
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW
8.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.5 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
203 hp
151 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
-
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Range score
864 km
537 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 33 hp more
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Is 217 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 386 km (240 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 147 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster