Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
- Lightest1,444 kg3,183 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Largest trunk432 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful203 hp151 kW
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 203hp151kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | - | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,661kg3,662lb | 1,444kg3,183lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 87.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.5s Calculated | 50.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,903mm193in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 2,154mm85in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,610mm63in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,569mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 432L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,000L | 1,684L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.5 s | 50.3 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 170 hp 127 kW |
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 33 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.
The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 33 hp (25 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 8.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 864 km 537 mi |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 203 hp 151 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost | Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
- Is 217 kg lighter
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 386 km (240 mi) more estimated range
- Has 147 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























