Volkswagen Touran II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSIvsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,444 kg3,183 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,466kg3,232lb | 1,444kg3,183lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 88.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.9s Calculated | 50.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,610mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 156mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 834L | 432L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,980L | 1,684L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 3,500 rpm | 2,000-2,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.9 s | 50.5 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 170 hp 127 kW |
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI has 10 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.
The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 8.3 s |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 935 km 581 mi |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI | Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 402 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 22 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 315 km (195 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























