Car comparison

Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSIvsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Touran II

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2016-2018
VS

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    142 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    935 km
    581 mi
  • Largest trunk
    834 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Most powerful
    182 hp
    136 kW
  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSIFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
180hp134kW
182hp136kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,466kg3,232lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,130kg4,696lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
90.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
43.9s
Calculated
44.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
935km581mi
Calculated
887km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,596cc97cu in
Length
4,527mm178in
4,380mm172in
Width
1,829mm72in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,626mm64in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,542mm61in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
156mm6in
-
Trunk volume
834L
432L
Max trunk volume
1,980L
1,723L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
55L
CO2 emissions
142g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSIFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI5,100-6,200 rpm1,250-5,000 rpm6,450 rpm
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSIFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.9 s
44.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
1,466 kg
3,232 lb
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI8.3 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost8.5 s

Although Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost has more power, Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
935 km
581 mi
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
8.3 s
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
834 L
29.5 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.3 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSIFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
180 hp
134 kW
182 hp
136 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,466 kg
3,232 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
834 L
29.5 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Range score
935 km
581 mi
887 km
551 mi
CO2 score
142 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
834 L
29.5 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSIFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 402 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 2 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 156 kg lighter
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI vs Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster