Volkswagen Touran II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSIvsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord C-MAX II
1.6 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions142 g/km
- Best estimated range935 km581 mi
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Most powerful182 hp136 kW
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,466kg3,232lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.9s Calculated | 44.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,626mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 156mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 834L | 432L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,980L | 1,723L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.9 s | 44.5 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 8.3 s |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
Although Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost has more power, Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 935 km 581 mi |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI | Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touran II 1.8 TSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Has 402 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 156 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























