Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Sharan II
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful203 hp151 kW
- Lightest1,661 kg3,662 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range864 km537 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score85/100
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 203hp151kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | - | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,661kg3,662lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 108.1s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 100.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.7s Calculated | 47.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,903mm193in | 4,854mm191in |
| Width | 2,154mm85in | 1,904mm75in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,919mm115in |
| Front track | - | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,617mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,000L | 2,297L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 196g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.7 s | 47.2 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 3 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 3 hp (2 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.3 s |
Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 864 km 537 mi |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.3 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 203 hp 151 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 196 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost | Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 129 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























