Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Galaxy III
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,661 kg3,662 lb
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 203hp151kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | - | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,661kg3,662lb | 1,704kg3,757lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,620kg5,776lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.5s Calculated | 53.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 1,273km791mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,903mm193in | 4,848mm191in |
| Width | 2,154mm85in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,747mm69in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,000L | 2,339L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.5 s | 53.1 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 7 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 7 hp (5 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 8.9 s |
Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 864 km 537 mi |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 203 hp 151 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 1,273 km 791 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Is 43 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Has 7 hp more
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 409 km (254 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























