Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

203 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
203hp151kW
210hp157kW
Torque-
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,620kg5,776lb
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
46.5s
Calculated
53.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
864km537mi
Calculated
1,273km791mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,848mm191in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase-
2,849mm112in
Front track-
1,606mm63in
Rear track-
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume
285L
300L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions-
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.5 s
53.1 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 7 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 7 hp (5 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
221 km/h
137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost8.5 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi8.9 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
864 km
537 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW
8.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.5 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
203 hp
151 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
-
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.9 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
864 km
537 mi
1,273 km
791 mi
CO2 score
-
144 g/km
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 43 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 409 km (254 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster