Car comparison

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220dvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)

220d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Lightest
    1,495 kg
    3,296 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    122 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    645 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
190hp142kW
210hp157kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,140kg4,718lb
2,620kg5,776lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
86.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
101.2s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
39.8s
Calculated
53.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,109km689mi
Calculated
1,273km791mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,556mm179in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,608mm63in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,558mm61in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
645L
300L
Max trunk volume
1,905L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
70L
CO2 emissions
122g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220dFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d4,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.8 s
53.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
190 hp
142 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 20 hp more than BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
220 km/h
137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d7.8 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi8.9 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has more power, BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
1,109 km
689 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
220 km/h
137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,556 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,608 mm
63.3 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
7.8 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
190 hp
142 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,556 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,608 mm
63.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
1,109 km
689 mi
1,273 km
791 mi
CO2 score
122 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
645 L
22.8 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220dFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.05 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.96 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used690 L182 US gal152 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,208 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d

  • Is 209 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 345 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

220d
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
220d
223d
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
220d
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dvsBMW2 Series Convertible (F23)220i
2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
220d
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dvsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)220d
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
220d
220d
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dvsBMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F44)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
220d
220i
VS
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220dvsBMW2 Series Coupe (G42)220i
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220d vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster