Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph Unrestricted
    220 km/h
    137 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    965 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Lightest
    1,704 kg
    3,757 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
240hp179kW
210hp157kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,876kg4,136lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,600kg5,732lb
2,620kg5,776lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
106.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
40.0s
Calculated
53.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,050km652mi
Calculated
1,273km791mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,796mm189in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,850mm112in
2,849mm112in
Front track-
1,606mm63in
Rear track-
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume
965L
300L
Max trunk volume
2,020L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
70L
CO2 emissions-
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.0 s
53.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue has 30 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue8.6 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi and Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1,050 km
652 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
240 hp
179 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
965 L
34.1 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
1,050 km
652 mi
1,273 km
791 mi
CO2 score
-
144 g/km
Trunk score
965 L
34.1 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 665 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Is 172 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 223 km (138 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
223i
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223i
2.0 TDCi
220d
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
3.5 V6
VS
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2.0 TDCi
220d
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster