Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

203 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,658 kg
    3,655 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240hp179kW
203hp151kW
Torque
345Nm254lb-ft
-
Curb weight
1,658kg3,655lb
1,661kg3,662lb
Gross weight
2,585kg5,699lb
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
98.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
43.3s
Calculated
46.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
-
Estimated range
886km551mi
Calculated
864km537mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
-
Length
4,848mm191in
4,903mm193in
Width
1,916mm75in
2,154mm85in
Height
1,747mm69in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
-
Front track
1,606mm63in
-
Rear track
1,606mm63in
-
Ground clearance
124mm5in
-
Trunk volume
300L
285L
Max trunk volume
2,339L
2,000L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
180g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.3 s
46.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has 37 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 37 hp (28 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
221 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost8.6 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost8.5 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
886 km
551 mi
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
864 km
537 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW
8.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
203 hp
151 kW
Torque
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
-
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
886 km
551 mi
864 km
537 mi
CO2 score
180 g/km
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 37 hp more
  • Is 3 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
225i
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
220i
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster