Car comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBluevsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX II · Facelift 2019

2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

240 hpDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2019-2023

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.6 s
Fastest top speed
230 km/h
143 mph Unrestricted
220 km/h
137 mph Restricted
Most powerful
240 hp
179 kW
Highest torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Best estimated range
1,050 km
652 mi
Largest trunk
965 L
Best overall score
66/100
Best performance score
52/100
Best economy score
91/100
Best practicality score
95/100

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

Lightest
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Best power-to-weight
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power	240hp179kW	240hp179kW
Torque	500Nm369lb-ft	345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight	1,876kg4,136lb	1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight	2,600kg5,732lb	2,585kg5,699lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated	222 km/h 138 mph
To 99% top speed	107.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated	99.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.6s	8.6s
0-200 km/h	40.1s Calculated	43.5s Calculated
0-60 mph	8.1s Calculated	8.1s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK	7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK	10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK	6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.2s Calculated	16.2s Calculated
Power-to-weight	128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated	145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated	208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	1,050km652mi Calculated	886km551mi Calculated
Displacement	-	1,999cc122cu in
Length	4,796mm189in	4,848mm191in
Width	1,916mm75in	1,916mm75in
Height	1,655mm65in	1,747mm69in
Wheelbase	2,850mm112in	2,849mm112in
Front track	-	1,606mm63in
Rear track	-	1,606mm63in
Ground clearance	-	124mm5in
Trunk volume	965L	300L
Max trunk volume	2,020L	2,339L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	63L	70L
CO2 emissions	-	180g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlueFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	4,000 rpm	2,000 rpm	4,250 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	5,400 rpm	2,300-4,900 rpm	5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.1 s	8.1 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.6 s	8.6 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	40.1 s	43.5 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited	222 km/h 138 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.6 s	2.6 s
330 ft 101 m	7.0 s	7.0 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.6 s	10.6 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.6 s	13.7 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.2 s	16.2 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	142 km/h 88 mph	142 km/h 88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	240 hp 179 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	240 hp 179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	500 Nm 369 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	345 Nm 254 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	1,876 kg 4,136 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	1,658 kg 3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	222 km/h 138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	8.6 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	8.6 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	1,050 km 652 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	886 km 551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	240 hp 179 kW	8.6 s	Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	240 hp 179 kW	8.6 s	222 km/h 138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	965 L 34.1 cu ft
Length	4,796 mm 188.8 in
Height	1,655 mm 65.2 in

FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 222 km/h 138 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	300 L 10.6 cu ft
Length	4,848 mm 190.9 in
Height	1,747 mm 68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph

6.0 L/100 km

39.2 mpg US

47.1 mpg UK

FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 222 km/h 138 mph

7.9 L/100 km

29.8 mpg US

35.8 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK	8.6 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK	8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp	6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue

FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost

Power

240 hp

179 kW

240 hp

179 kW

Torque

500 Nm

369 lb-ft

345 Nm

254 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.6 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

230 km/h143 mph

Restricted

220 km/h137 mph

222 km/h

138 mph

Lightness

1,876 kg

4,136 lb

1,658 kg

3,655 lb

Fuel consumption

6.0 L/100 km

39.2 mpg US

47.1 mpg UK

7.9 L/100 km

29.8 mpg US

35.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	965 L 34.1 cu ft
Length	4,796 mm 188.8 in
Height	1,655 mm 65.2 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	300 L 10.6 cu ft
Length	4,848 mm 190.9 in
Height	1,747 mm 68.8 in

Range score

1,050 km

652 mi

886 km

551 mi

CO2 score

180 g/km

Trunk score

965 L

34.1 cu ft

300 L

10.6 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

128 hp/t

95 kW/t

7.8 kg/hp

145 hp/t

108 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford S-MAX II Facelift 2019 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue	Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption	6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK	7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	10.50 LC100 km	13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	16.90 LC100 mi	22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	900 L238 US gal198 UK gal	1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,575 LC/year	2,074 LC/year