Car comparison

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220ivsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)

220i

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    953 km
    592 mi
  • Largest trunk
    645 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
192hp143kW
240hp179kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight
1,455kg3,208lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,100kg4,630lb
2,585kg5,699lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
87.4s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
99.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
37.8s
Calculated
43.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
953km592mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,556mm179in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,800mm71in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,608mm63in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,558mm61in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
645L
300L
Max trunk volume
1,905L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
70L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
180g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220iFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i5,000 rpm1,250 rpm5,250 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.8 s
43.5 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
192 hp
143 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has 48 hp more than BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 48 hp (36 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
223 km/h
139 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
953 km
592 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
192 hp
143 kW
7.7 s
223 km/h
139 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,556 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,608 mm
63.3 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.7 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220iFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
192 hp
143 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
8.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,556 mm
179.4 in
Height
1,608 mm
63.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
953 km
592 mi
886 km
551 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
180 g/km
Trunk score
645 L
22.8 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220iFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i

  • Is 203 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 345 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 31 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 48 hp more
  • Has 65 Nm more
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster