BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220ivsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Galaxy III
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range953 km592 mi
- Largest trunk645 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque345 Nm254 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 345Nm254lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,658kg3,655lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.4s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 99.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.8s Calculated | 43.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 953km592mi Calculated | 886km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,556mm179in | 4,848mm191in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,747mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 645L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,905L | 2,339L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 180g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i: Power / Torque
- Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 5,000 rpm | 1,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 5,400 rpm | 2,300-4,900 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.8 s | 43.5 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW |
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has 48 hp more than BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 7.7 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 8.6 s |
Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 953 km 592 mi |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 886 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 953 km 592 mi | 886 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 180 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 645 L 22.8 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Gran Tourer (F46) 220i
- Is 203 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 67 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 345 L more trunk volume
- Emits 31 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























