Ford Puma · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsPeugeot 2008 II · Facelift 2023 1.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 2008 II · Facelift 2023
1.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range880 km547 mi
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful155 hp116 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lightest1,293 kg2,851 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 155hp116kW | 136hp101kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,293kg2,851lb | 1,372kg3,025lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.6s Calculated | 57.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 999cc61cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,186mm165in | 4,304mm169in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,775mm70in |
| Height | 1,550mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,588mm102in | 2,605mm103in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 163mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 456L | 545L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,216L | 1,467L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 42L | 44L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.6 s | 57.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 142 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 136 hp 101 kW |
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 19 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 1,372 kg 3,025 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 8.3 s |
Although Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 667 km 414 mi |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 880 km 547 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 136 hp 101 kW | 8.3 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 155 hp 116 kW | 136 hp 101 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb | 1,372 kg 3,025 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost | Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 79 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 213 km (133 mi) more estimated range
- Has 89 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























