Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0vsPeugeot 2008 II · Facelift 2023 1.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 2008 II · Facelift 2023
1.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score94/100
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Lightest1,372 kg3,025 lb
- Best power-to-weight99 hp/t74 kW/t10.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 136hp101kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,372kg3,025lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 77.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 58.5s Calculated | 57.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 938km583mi Calculated | 880km547mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,304mm169in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,775mm70in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,605mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 545L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,467L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 44L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 3,750-4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 58.5 s | 57.2 s |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 142 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 136 hp 101 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 has 14 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 1,372 kg 3,025 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 8.5 s |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 8.3 s |
Although Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 has more power, Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 938 km 583 mi |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 880 km 547 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 136 hp 101 kW | 8.3 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0 | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 136 hp 101 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,372 kg 3,025 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 938 km 583 mi | 880 km 547 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 93 hp/t 69 kW/t 10.8 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0 | Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) D 2.0
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 57 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2
- Is 248 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























