Peugeot 2008 II · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Peugeot 2008 II · Facelift 2023 1.2vsVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed206 km/h128 mph
- Lightest1,372 kg3,025 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range982 km610 mi
- Best performance score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136hp101kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,372kg3,025lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated | 77.0s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 57.3s Calculated | 90.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 880km547mi Calculated | 982km610mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,199cc73cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,304mm169in | 4,236mm167in |
| Width | 1,775mm70in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,550mm61in | 1,582mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,605mm103in | 2,594mm102in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,552mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 545L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,467L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 57.3 s | 90.5 s |
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 136 hp 101 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI has 14 hp more than Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 1,372 kg 3,025 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
Although Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI has more power, Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 880 km 547 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 982 km 610 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 136 hp 101 kW | 8.3 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2 | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp 101 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 206 km/h 128 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,372 kg 3,025 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 880 km 547 mi | 982 km 610 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2 | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 2008 II Facelift 2023 1.2
- Is 114 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 153 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 102 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























