Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5vsFord Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 B5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2021
VS

Ford Evos

2.0 EcoBoost

238 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    238 hp
    177 kW
  • Lightest
    1,655 kg
    3,649 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,203 km
    748 mi
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
235hp175kW
238hp177kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
376Nm277lb-ft
Curb weight
1,950kg4,299lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight-
2,065kg4,553lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
To 99% top speed
79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 191 km/h / 119 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
36.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,203km748mi
Calculated
880km547mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,920mm194in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,920mm76in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,600mm63in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,945mm116in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,610mm63in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
168mm7in
Trunk volume
505L
-
Max trunk volume
1,432L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
66L
CO2 emissions
155g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
  • Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B54,000 rpm1,740-2,280 rpm5,000 rpm
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost5,500 rpm2,500-3,750 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.7 s
-
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
235 hp
175 kW
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost has 3 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
376 Nm
277 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
220 km/h
137 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
193 km/h
120 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B57.1 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost6.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
1,203 km
748 mi
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
880 km
547 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
235 hp
175 kW
7.1 s
220 km/h
137 mph
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
238 hp
177 kW
6.6 s
193 km/h
120 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
193 km/h
120 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 B5FordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
Power
235 hp
175 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
376 Nm
277 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
6.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
193 km/h
120 mph
Lightness
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Range score
1,203 km
748 mi
880 km
547 mi
CO2 score
155 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B5Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5

  • Has 104 Nm more
  • Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 323 km (201 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Is 295 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 B5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 B5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
2.0 B5
25d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0 EcoBoost
25d
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 B5
380TSI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
300
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 B5
45 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 B5
45 TDI V6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5vsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
2.0 EcoBoost
650T
VS
FordEvos2.0 EcoBoostvsChevroletBlazer650T
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 vs Ford Evos 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster