Volkswagen Tayron I
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,750 kg3,858 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk506 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.5s Calculated | 36.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 788km489mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,595mm181in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,731mm108in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 506L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,280 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.5 s | 36.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 has 15 hp more than Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 7.1 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 has more power, Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 788 km 489 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.1 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron I380TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 788 km 489 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron I 380TSI
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 416 km (258 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























