Ford Puma · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful155 hp116 kW
- Lightest1,293 kg2,851 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk456 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 155hp116kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,293kg2,851lb | 1,466kg3,232lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 84.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.6s Calculated | 65.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 926km575mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 999cc61cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,186mm165in | 4,451mm175in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,550mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,588mm102in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,555mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 163mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 456L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,216L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 42L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.6 s | 65.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 667 km 414 mi |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 926 km 575 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 155 hp 116 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 926 km 575 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 173 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 6 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 259 km (161 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























