Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Cupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,466 kg3,232 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,466kg3,232lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 84.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.8s Calculated | 65.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 655km407mi Calculated | 926km575mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,381mm172in | 4,451mm175in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,625mm64in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,679mm105in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 450L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 8.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.8 s | 65.5 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 40 hp more than Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 655 km 407 mi |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 926 km 575 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,466 kg 3,232 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 655 km 407 mi | 926 km 575 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 hp more
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 39 kg lighter
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 271 km (168 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























