Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Ateca · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range866 km538 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,601kg3,530lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.6s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.8s Calculated | 40.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 866km538mi Calculated | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,509mm178in | 4,381mm172in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.8 s | 40.8 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 866 km 538 mi |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 655 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI | CupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,601 kg 3,530 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 866 km 538 mi | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 211 km (131 mi) more estimated range
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Cupra Ateca Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 96 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























