Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivvsChevrolet Seeker 1.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

2.5 e-Skyactiv

192 hp2488 ccHybridAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2022-present
VS

Chevrolet Seeker

1.5T

184 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDCVTTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    261 Nm
    193 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.5 L/100 km
    156.8 mpg US
    188.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    3,333 km
    2,071 mi
  • Largest trunk
    477 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivChevroletSeeker1.5T
Power
192hp143kW
184hp137kW
Torque
261Nm193lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
2,072kg4,568lb
1,410kg3,109lb
Gross weight
2,667kg5,880lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
64.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
70.7s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
38.7s
Calculated
55.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1.5L/100 km156.8mpg US188.3mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.7mpg US42.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
93hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
126Nm/t84lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
3,333km2,071mi
Calculated
760km472mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,488cc152cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,537mm179in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,823mm72in
Height
1,685mm66in
1,572mm62in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,573mm62in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
-
Trunk volume
477L
414L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,405L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivChevrolet Seeker 1.5TPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv6,000 rpm-6,250 rpm
ChevroletSeeker1.5T5,500 rpm1,500-5,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivChevroletSeeker1.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.7 s
55.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
184 hp
137 kW

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv has 8 hp more than Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T and Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
1,410 kg
3,109 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv5.8 s
ChevroletSeeker1.5T7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T: 2.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv and Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T: 5.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
3,333 km
2,071 mi
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
760 km
472 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
192 hp
143 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
184 hp
137 kW
7.9 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,537 mm
178.6 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
5.8 s
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-602.5 e-Skyactiv
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
ChevroletSeeker1.5T
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivChevroletSeeker1.5T
Power
192 hp
143 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
261 Nm
193 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
2,072 kg
4,568 lb
1,410 kg
3,109 lb
Fuel consumption
1.5 L/100 km
156.8 mpg US
188.3 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.7 mpg US
42.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,537 mm
178.6 in
Height
1,572 mm
61.9 in
Range score
3,333 km
2,071 mi
760 km
472 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
93 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.8 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 2.5 e-SkyactivChevrolet Seeker 1.5T
Consumption1.5 L/100 km156.8 mpg US188.3 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.7 mpg US42.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km2.63 LC100 km11.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi4.22 LC100 mi18.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used225 L59 US gal49 UK gal987 L261 US gal217 UK gal
Annual fuel cost393.75 LC/year1,727 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 11 Nm more
  • Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2,573 km (1,599 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 63 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T

  • Is 662 kg lighter
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv
Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1.5T
650T
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsChevroletBlazer650T
2.5 e-Skyactiv
1.5i P300e
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
1.5T
1.3 T270
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsAbarthPulse1.3 T270
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
350h
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 TSI
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5T
40 TFSI
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.5 e-Skyactiv
GLA 220d
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
1.5T
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
ChevroletSeeker1.5TvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.5 e-Skyactiv
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-602.5 e-SkyactivvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
Mazda CX-60 2.5 e-Skyactiv vs Chevrolet Seeker 1.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster